← SHROUD ATLASCHAPTER 16 TIMELINEALL 21 CHAPTERS

THE SHROUD ATLAS · CHAPTER 16 · HISTORICAL EVENT ESSAY

c. 692–695

Justinian II issues coins with Christ’s image

Frontal Christ portraits later become part of Shroud iconography debates.

The coins document Byzantine iconography. Claims that their features were copied from the Turin Shroud are interpretive, not a consensus conclusion; they do not establish the cloth’s location.

During his first reign, Justinian II placed a frontal image of Christ on Byzantine gold solidi, around 692–695. This was a major change in imperial coin design: the emperor’s portrait shared the monetary medium with a sacred portrait of Christ. Museum collections preserve examples that can be dated and studied as material evidence, unlike later literary claims about the image’s origin.1

What the surviving source says

The coin shows Christ as ruler, with a cross nimbus and a blessing gesture; it does not identify its model. Comparisons between the portrait and the Shroud face are interpretive and depend on selecting features from highly stylized images. Coin dies are small, conventional images shaped by theology and imperial messaging, not precise photographic records.12

Gold solidus of Justinian II, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 692–695. The coin documents Christ’s image on imperial currency; it does not establish the Shroud as its model.
Gold solidus of Justinian II, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 692–695. The coin documents Christ’s image on imperial currency; it does not establish the Shroud as its model.

Historical significance and limits

The solidi establish that Christ’s portrait entered official Byzantine coinage in Justinian II’s reign. They provide important evidence for visual culture and imperial theology. Resemblance to the Shroud cannot establish the textile’s age or prove that the engraver had access to it.23

Sources and further reading

  1. Metropolitan Museum of Art, Solidus of Justinian II (692–695). Consult the cited passage in the full source and its transmission context; the article distinguishes the source’s wording from later interpretation.
  2. Otangelo Grasso, The Image That Should Not Exist: A Scientific Investigation of the Shroud of Turin (2026), ch. 2, “Origins and Historical Record,” pp. 23–31, and ch. 17, “The Mandylion, Art, and the Historical Record,” pp. 232–243. Author synthesis; not an independent witness.
  3. Otangelo Grasso, From Forensics to Faith (2026), ch. 2, “Pre-1355 History,” pp. 32–125, and ch. 3, “6th to 14th Century History,” pp. 126–194. The book advances a proposed reconstruction; claims are assessed here against the primary texts.
  4. Otangelo Grasso, Chronological List of Pre-1356 Literature Mentioning the Shroud and Christ’s Burial Cloth (20 July 2025), pp. 1–9. Prepared with AI assistance and used as a research checklist; its identifications and confidence labels are not treated as verified facts.
  5. Mark Guscin, The Tradition of the Image of Edessa (source study). Further reading or contextual source retained from this event’s earlier bibliography.
  6. Andrea Nicolotti, From the Mandylion of Edessa to the Shroud of Turin (critical study). Further reading or contextual source retained from this event’s earlier bibliography.
  7. Gold solidus of Justinian II, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 692–695. The coin documents Christ’s image on imperial currency. Further reading or contextual source retained from this event’s earlier bibliography.
  8. Image source: Gold solidus of Justinian II, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 692–695. The coin documents Christ’s image on imperial currency. it does not establish the Shroud as its model.
← Return to the timeline